Into the third year without Constitutional Rights in Canada.

The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.

Albert Einstein

Perjuries, Instigation to child-abuses, civil conspiracies, ransoms in exchange for access to justice, parental alienation of children, abuse of powers, all “legalized” in Brampton Family Courts of Injustice, to protect a zero credibility ex-comrade with a documented history of unethical activities at the expenses of an innocent child.

Empty Statements

Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017

Paramount purpose
1 (1) The paramount purpose of this Act is to promote the best interests, protection, and well-being of children.[…]

(Brampton and, Isabella Street, Toronto, both,
are designated exempt areas, of course.)
Law Society of Ontario (LSO)

Law Society Of Ontario

“Unmet legal needs have a profound negative impact on individuals and society in Ontario. To address these needs with finite resources and a defined regulatory mandate, the Law Society must ensure its access to justice initiatives are effective and consistent with its statutory functions.”

(Not applying to Brampton and Theresa MacLean, LSO# 29576U
when involved.)


Ethical Principles for Judges


“As indicated in the chapter on Judicial Independence, judges have the duty to uphold and defend judicial independence, not as a privilege of judicial office but as the constitutionally guaranteed right of everyone to have their disputes heard and decided by impartial judges.”

(Not applying to Brampton, when Court Administration and
Fax Machines are Ordered to Deny Access to Justice by the
“more experienced” Theresa MacLean and her ex-comrades.)

“Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge’s obligations of impartial conduct. … Judicial misconduct leads only seldom to a formal investigation. A court decision is not beyond critique.”

“Four types of prosecutorial misconduct are offering inadmissible evidence in court, suppressing evidence from the defense, encouraging deceit from witnesses, and prosecutorial bluffing (threats or intimidation).”

New family-law legislation, 2018

“The federal government introduced new family-law legislation (April-July 2018) the first significant changes to the Divorce Act in 20 years and is more focussed on the best interests of the child.”

(Not applying to Brampton, Ontario, Canada)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s